This case was initiated on 24 November 2000 with the filing of an information 112479 at Victoria Courthouse. This information was based upon a search of Jason Lalancette's suite - which itself was executed on a warrant which was patently illegal. At the third appearance with my client, an order was granted under S.530 of the Criminal Code for the language of trial: English, the first time such an order has been granted to a person who speaks the same language. click on this underlined link to see the document

There has been a small but concerted rebellion in the ranks of the the judiciary, as can be seen by the actions of a few of these judges to act in defiance of  the criminal conspiracy and to comply with their mandatory administrative functions.

They are a far cry from the hyenas who have shrieked their rage at me and my clients when we have made simple application for  those rights that parliament has deemed mandatory for any accused before these courts. 

Despite the criminal assaults by judge Smith to have the chosen counsel of Mr. Lalancette dragged from the court and his further attempts to have the chosen counsel barred from those courts, one of his fellow judges refused to follow him and allowed full representation by the chosen counsel and granted the landmark order for the language at trial

To put it into full perspective; at that time Judge Smith was the senior administrator for the other Judges at the Victoria Courthouse. He and Judge Ercke and Judge Harvey and the infamous Judge Ramsey   were the driving force behind the "s. 530" Conspiracy. Those four committed criminal acts by definition of s. 126 of the Criminal Code even after the ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada in R.v Beaulac that "the violation of s. 530 is a substantial wrong . Judges palmer and Higinbotham committed their criminal acts before the ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada, while pretending that it wasn't criminal. Judge ehrcke committed her Criminal acts both before and after that ruling.

A few years later Judge Smith was removed from the Victoria Courthouse. I wonder if that had anything to do with the fact that he brought his buddy  Judge Ramsey down from Prince George to do the dirty in the "Holst" case?

Crown Counsel stayed the charges against my client Jason on Feb. 6, 2001 

It is unfortunate that miss Cerny; Jason's co-accused, was intimidated and bullied into pleading guilty. She now has a drug conviction record which will bar her from travelling in the US and some other countries.

The most delightful consequence of this matter was the successful action by Jason to have his pot-growing materials returned to him.

I took great delight in assisting Jason to serve the court order of the Provincial Court of BC on the Central Saannich police ordering them to return his pot-growing materials to him forthwith.

This was the first such order issued in Canada.

Mr. Lalancette's success was based on the "THE CANADIAN BILL OF RIGHTS"  the only Canadian law which actually states that we have the right to own property. It is one of the few legacies of the 1950's conservative government that actually recognized any of our basic rights under common law.

The rules they said they'd never make

They still fall far short of bestowing any proper Jurisdiction for proceedings in the Provincial Court.

Because of that deficiency of jurisdiction, no proceedings past the first appearance of a defendant has any legitimacy.

Because of that lack of legitimacy, the Supreme Court of BC cannot inherit any proper jurisdiction from the lower court. Hence the Supreme Court Has been acting illegaly, and every trial in that court has been the result of a criminal conspiracy to act without proper jurisdiction.

To put it simply, the court system of BC is a reverse pyramid, with the provincial court being the first brick on which all the other complex structures are balanced.

If that brick has no substance, then all the structure above has no foundation on which to exist

The rules were changed in response to Mr. Parsons exposure of the illegality of at least one of those rules: Specifically: rule 63. It was replaced by rule 4 of the new rules of court. It is still illegal

The transcript requirements of the "new rules" are still illegal and have not elevated this court from their criminal conspiracy to pervert and defeat the purpose of the law and deprive those appealing to this court of their legal and constitutional rights. 

The transcript requirements of the rules of this court are highly illegal and constitute a criminal conspiracy to pervert and defeat the purpose of the law and deprive those appealing to this court of their legal and constitutional rights. 

"...S. 530 is a back door created by Parliament to allow the Judges of B.C. to escape from the criminal conspiracy in which they have been trapped by following the illegal and criminal actions of the OLD PIGS OF THE LAW who have insisted that the law issues from their CAKEHOLE and not from the mouths of Parliament....

...The action of Judge Ehrcke on 14 Jan, 1997 in implying qualifications to an unambiguous and mandatory section of the criminal law of my country and thereby dismissing the application on those fictional grounds, demonstrates the deterioration of these courts to proclaim CAKEHOLE LAW in place of the law of my country....

     THAT CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY WAS CONSUMMATED BY OWEN-FLOOD AND BY QUIANO WHEN THEY DISMISSED MY APPLICATIONS ON THE GROUNDS THAT THEY HAD NO JURISDICTION TO HEAR THEM

     At the hearing before Owen-flood on #91203 (V03001) 29 JAN. 1997 the argument of Dr. George J. Ivanesko, executive crown counsel victoria, in adversarial response to my application for the remedy of MANDAMUS to compel judge ehrcke to grant my mandatory right for an order under S.530 C.C.;the legal argument??? he resorted to, when Owen-flood appeared to be wavering in my favour, was

      "IF YOU DO THIS FOR HIM, YOU WILL HAVE TO DO IT FOR  EVERYONE, IT WILL OPEN THE FLOODGATES"

     Further at the hearing for MANDAMUS before Quiano on # 92278T (V03057) for a writ to compel Higinbotham to make an  order that the crown make proper disclosure on file # 05192 colwood in accordance with R.V.STINCHCOMBE.
   Before addressing me, Quiano stated to Harold Rusk (crown)
       "I DON'T FEEL RIGHT ABOUT DOING THIS"
   And Rusk replied
      "IF YOU DON'T, IT WILL OPEN THE FLOODGATES" or words to that effect.

     In the reasons for judgement Quiano stated
        "MANDAMUS HAS BEEN ABOLISHED, MR RUSK IS RIGHT, THERE IS NO JURISDICTION"

In the above excerpts from two Affidavits, the Judge Quiano was misspelled: I believe the proper spelling is Quijano.

I did not correct the spelling in order to maintain the integrity of the documents. It has also been posted on the dockets as Qiano: These Judges often have their names mispelled or even erased from the dockets when they hear that they will be sitting before me.

They know their names will be up on my website with the description " Criminal " when they violate the law.

This was an application for a WRIT OF MANDAMUS .

Mandamus is an ancient extraordinary remedy, which was and is, the only real recourse we the common people had, and now have back again, to defend ourselves against any Criminally minded or merely incompetent judge or other judiciary who violates our rights under law.

There is no other mandatory remedy available to us.

The remedy of Mandamus was firmly entrenched in the criminal law of Canada in historical times to ensure that the judicial system would not degenerate into a police state.

In 1972 the Supreme Court criminal rules of BC proclaimed that Mandamus had been abolished

This was a declaration of the POLICE STATE OF BC; the doors of the Supreme Court were officially barred from any Appeal by Mandamus to remedy any wrongdoing by the Provincial Court.

I didn't knock on that door; I just kicked it in, because I had a right to be there. I had to kick that door in three times before those judges finally backed down and cried uncle.

I took that lifeless corpse those judges had murdered and breathed life back into it, and now,

MANDAMUS IS ALIVE AND WELL AGAIN IN THE COURTS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA 

To be fair and honest, I must report that it was Justice Owen-Flood who first broke from the Mandamus Conspiracy When He shouted at Harold Rusk on my third assualt on that conspiracy: 

" WHAT JURISDICTION DON'T I HAVE; SHOW IT TO ME. "

The Court of Appeal had pretty well conceded by that time that I HAD AN ABSOLUTE RIGHT TO APPLY FOR MANDAMUS. 

Poor Harold Rusk; These legal hitmen the Attorney General hires to take me on, like some ancient gunslingers, all make the same mistake: they can't conceive that someone who looks like me could ever beat them and the entire Juggernaught of the law behind them.

Poor Harold: His name is now forever tied to the Mandamus Conspiracy

As Harold once said to me, " that's  the story of my life " when I asked if he ever got disgusted with what he was doing.

I told Harold " Someday, I'm going to publish the story of your life

Justice Owen-Flood dismissed the application on the grounds that the Rules of court of the Supreme Court of BC had abolished Mandamus as a mandatory hearing under Criminal Law and had replaced it as a discretionary hearing under civil law.

As You can see from the adjacent column   the Supreme Court has reversed itself 180degrees and has effectively declared it's own rules of court illegal.

"An Application for An Order of Mandamus"

"7. On Sept. 4, 1997 I presented a letter undated to manager, Court Services Colwood, in which it was requested that these court services direct me to where the Criminal Rules of Court for the provincial courts pursuant to S. 482 could be found. I received a letter dated Sept. 10, 1997 from said Court Services (J.P. Adams) directing me to LAW LIBRARY Victoria Courthouse Burdett Ave. In my extensive research I discovered that there are no official criminal rules for provincial courts in B.C."

Since Mr. Parsons' challenge in the Court of Appeal on the lack of rules for Provincial Courts, the courts have made some of those very rules.

you'll hafta type in the email address manually to email me, sorry bout that. The spammers have e-bots crawling all through the internet harvesting email addresses from any email links on web pages.